Oregon Criminal Defense, Family Law, & Real Estate Law Attorneys
Request a Consultation 541.238.9210
Divorce Attorneys
Serving Bend, OR

Divorce Attorney in Bend

Understanding Divorce Law in Bend, Oregon

A “divorce” in Oregon legally ends a marriage or a Registered Domestic Partnership. In Oregon, a “divorce” is often referred to as a "dissolution of marriage" because the parties are dissolving their life together (they are dividing their “stuff,” including kids).

Call us today to speak our divorce lawyer in Bend about your options.

What if I just moved to Oregon?

Generally, in order to file for divorce in Oregon, one party to the divorce must live in Oregon for at least the last six months. If one of the parties has not lived in Oregon for the last six months, a party may still be able to file for a legal separation however.

Divorce v. Separation v. Annulment in Oregon

The main difference between a legal separation and a divorce in Oregon is that spouses are still married after a legal separation. Like a divorce, a legal separation judgment can establish custody, parenting time, and child support. In certain circumstances, the judgment can also divide property and debts and establish spousal or partner support. The court costs, timelines, and requirements for mediation and parenting classes are generally the same as with a divorce. With an annulment, the marriage is “void,” as if it never happened. The filing fees for an annulment in Oregon are the same for a divorce or a separation.

Process for Obtaining a Divorce in Oregon

Divorce in Oregon – The Basics

A dissolution of marriage or a Registered Domestic Partnership is started when one spouse or partner files a “Petition for Dissolution.” The spouse or partner who files the petition is called the “Petitioner.” The other spouse or partner is called the “Respondent” and usually files a “Response to Petition for Dissolution.” Both parties can file a joint petition, in which case they are the “Co-Petitioners.” A divorce ends when a judgment is signed by the court.

Temporary Relief (Pendente Lite)

After, or at the same time that a Petition for Dissolution is filed with the court, a party may move the court for temporary relief, pending the ultimate outcome of the case, or the judgment. This type of temporary relief is known as “pendent lite” relief. If a party seeking pendent lite relief prevails the court issues an order directing the other party to do something or in some cases, to not do something.

Following are types of temporary relief that may be available depending on a party’s circumstances:

Suit Money

Suit Money is an order of the court directing one party to pay another an amount of money necessary to enable the other party to prosecute or defend the case, including costs of expert witnesses, and may also include payment of an amount of money to the other party necessary to support and maintain the other party.

Temporary Use of the Marital Residence

Temporary Use of the Marital Residence is an order of the court directing either party or both to move out of a marital home for such period of time and under such conditions as the court may determine, whether the home is rented, owned or being purchased by one party or both parties. This type of temporary order may also direct one party or both to pay a martial home’s mortgage or rent during the case; it may also prevent either party or both from doing anything to cause a marital home’s value to decline such as taking out a loan secured by the home. This type of temporary order may also prevent a party or both from disposing of any of the real or personal property of either or both of the parties during the case, except as ordered by the court.

Status Quo Order

A status quo order (sometimes called a temporary protective order of restraint or TPOR) is an order which, until custody or parenting time is determined in a final judgment, prevents each party from changing aspects of a child’s life including the child’s residence; the child’s present placement, daily schedule, and routine; and the other party’s usual contact and parenting time with the child. It also seeks to prevent a parent from hiding the child or leaving the state with the child without the written permission of the other party or the permission of the court.

Temporary Custody and Parenting Time

After a party initiates a divorce, separation, or annulment in Oregon it may take some time for the court to enter a final judgment. While the matter is pending, a party may ask the court to award “temporary custody” to a party. When a party is awarded with “temporary custody,” that party is generally granted the same parental rights and duties as a party who ultimately is awarded with sole custody. Because the matter is still pending, the court may later change its temporary custody order in the final judgment.

Similarly, while a matter is pending, a party may ask to the court to determine the parties’ respective rights as they relate to parenting time, or visitation, with a child. This is usually called a “temporary parenting time order.” Again, because the matter is still pending in court, the court may later change its order in the final judgment.

Temporary Child Support

After a party initiates a divorce, separation, or annulment in Oregon it may take some time for the court to enter a final judgment. While the matter is pending, a party may ask the court to award them with temporary child support. The child support so awarded is known as “temporary child support” because this order lasts until the court enters a final judgment. Temporary child support is awarded in Oregon pursuant to Oregon Child Support Guidelines.

Temporary Spousal Support

After a party initiates a divorce, separation, or annulment in Oregon it may take some time for the court to enter a final judgment. While the matter is pending, a party may ask the court to award them with an amount of money necessary to support and maintain their lifestyle called “temporary spousal support.” While temporary support is generally awarded according to factors similar to those the court considers when making an ultimate spousal support determination, the court often focuses on the party’s immediate needs and the other party’s corresponding ability to pay. Again, because the matter is still pending in court, the court may later change its temporary spousal support order in the final judgment.

Permanent Relief Available in an Oregon Divorce

Division of Marital Assets in an Oregon Divorce

In Oregon, a “divorce” is often referred to as a "dissolution of marriage" because the parties are dissolving their life together and in the process, they are dividing their “stuff” or “assets.” Under Oregon law, the allocation of property between spouses at the time of the divorce must be “just and proper” depending on the individual circumstances of the parties and their marriage. Importantly, the court has the power to allocate any asset owned by the parties collectively or individually.

To determine what is just and proper, the court will first look at when a particular asset was acquired. If the asset was not acquired during the marriage, then the court considers only what is just and proper in distributing that property without applying any rules. If an asset is acquired during the marriage, it is subject to a rule called the “statutory presumption of equal contribution,” which means the court will start by assuming the asset was acquired through the equal effort of both parties.

A party may “rebut the presumption of equal contribution,” or prevent the application of the rule, if the party proves that the asset’s acquisition did not result from an equal contribution by the other spouse. The court will consider not only the monetary contributions of the parties but also other factors such as their contributions as a homemaker. Generally, in absence of other considerations, the appropriate division is usually an equal division.

If the court determines that the presumption of equal contribution has been rebutted, the court will generally divide the property according to the magnitude of each party’s contribution to the acquisition of the property. The court is always free to consider many, varied factors effecting the parties including the tax consequences to a party, the extent to which a party has integrated or commingled a separately acquired asset into the joint finances, how difficult it may be to disentangle the parties financially, and whether or not inequity would result from the award of such an asset to that party as separate property.

Division of Marital Debts in an Oregon Divorce

In Oregon, a “divorce” is often referred to as a "dissolution of marriage" because the parties are dissolving their life together and in the process, they are dividing their “stuff,” including the parties’ debts. Under Oregon law, the allocation of marital debts, much like the allocation of property, must be equitable depending on the individual circumstances of the parties and their marriage. An equitable division of the parties’ debts does not necessarily mean they will be divided equally or allocated to the party in whose name they were incurred. The court will generally try to financially disentangle the parties as much as possible.

If you are in need of further legal assistance with your divorce case, contact our Bend divorce lawyer!

  • Better Business Bureau
  • 10 Best Attorney
  • Rising Stars Joseph
  • Avvo 10.0
  • Lawyers of Distinction
  • 40 Under 40
  • Avvo
  • Rising Star Casey

Client Reviews & Testimonials

  • The extra mileThe extra mileThe extra mileThe extra mile

    “Mr. Baxter and his staff care. Plain and simple. They care what happens to you. From the first meeting I never felt like a name or a number. I was a person whose outcome mattered. I was charged with two felonies and without the hard work and knowledge of the courtroom that Casey provided their is no doubt I would have been convicted. It was amazing to watch Casey battle back when things seemed to be going the other way. He studied case files and did his homework late into the night so as to insure a favorable outcome. I'm so thankful I didn't plea bargain and allowed Casey to show me his skills. His knowledge at times seem to even help the judge. The cocky District Attorney who felt he had it wrapped up truly walked away with his head hung. Casey Baxter knows the courtroom, he knows the law, he knows what will work and not work and most of all he respects his clients. He understands and cares about the fact that his performance will have a profound effect on your life. I interviewed 7 lawyers in the area. Casey was the last one I interviewed. So thankful I went with Baxter Law as today Iam a free man and can get on with my life. Thank you Casey. Thank you Emily :)”

    Mark U.

  • Saved my life

    “Thank you all for the hard work. I was facing three felonies which thanks to Casey Baxter, Thaddeus Bentz, and Amy Margolis was able to plea to one misdemeanor. You guys saved my life!!”

    Jason

  • Outstanding in Representation

    “I must say I have dealt with quit a few different kinds of lawyers in my time and Casey and his team are outstanding in representation, very fair on compensation, they honestly do care about your outcome and will work with you till the end to their best abilities! I would recommend to anyone who needs his services to give his office a call! Casey and his team will take care of you!”

    Shelley

  • DUI, Reckless, and Interfering Defense

    “I selected Mr. Baxter to defend me against charges stemming from a DUI arrest. In addition to the DUI, I was also charged with reckless driving and interfering with the duties of a peace officer. Mr. Baxter's calm demeanor and support during this difficult, embarrassing incident were his primary assets. His extensive experience working in Deschutes County, in particular the District Attorney's office, also were factors in my decision. In the end, Mr. Baxter was able to get the Reckless and Interfering Charges dismissed and I am currently enrolled in diversion for the DUI. This was the best possible scenario I could have envisioned after facing the possibility of additional charges that would have resulted in substantial penalties. I have certainly learned a life lesson as a result of this arrest and am thankful to Mr. Baxter for his representation.”

    Previous Client

  • In the end, all criminal charges were dropped.

    “I was referred to Casey from another attorney for my criminal charge of Vehicular Assault of a Pedestrian and Reckless Driving. Casey saw me right away and knew how to handle the case. Since Casey used to work for the District Attorney's office he knew the opposing attorney, their style, and how to direct the case. In the end, all criminal charges were dropped. Thank you Casey!”

    Anonymous